Dominik Kellovsky vs Romain Faucon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Romain Faucon and Dominik Kellovsky have similar second serve success rates, with Kellovsky slightly ahead at 44.48% compared to Faucon's 43.57%. Can a marginal difference in second serve points significantly influence the match outcome?
• Kellovsky's edge is further highlighted in return games; he leads Faucon in opponent's second serve returns at 48.90% over Faucon's 47.08%.
• Interestingly, Faucon outshines Kellovsky on first serve returns, claiming 32.52% of points compared to Kellovsky's 28.88%.
• Under pressure, Faucon slightly outperforms, saving 50.50% of breakpoints, as opposed to Kellovsky's 49.06%.
• In general performance, both have similar match win rates over the last year with Kellovsky slightly leading at 58.73% while Faucon stands at 54.00%.
• Their career surface preferences show negligible differences, with Faucon excelling on indoor hard courts and Kellovsky on hard courts.
• Focusing on player levels, Faucon and Kellovsky mainly compete at similar event levels; however, Kellovsky boasts a higher win percentage of 63.64% in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments compared to Faucon's 54.00%.
• On opponent quality, Faucon regularly faces higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 269.06 against Kellovsky’s 425.89.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Kellovsky seems far more durable, winning 70% of such encounters compared to Faucon’s 33%.
• Assessing event-specific performance can be crucial once the tournament begins, as some players deliver better results at particular events.

Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the statistics, both Romain Faucon and Dominik Kellovsky present a tight competition. While Kellovsky shows a marginal advantage in several performance metrics, Faucon keeps the balance in others. Their overall win rate in the last year remains comparably similar, but Kellovsky slightly edges out his opponent with a better percentage.

The significant distinction lies in their performance under pressure and in deciding sets. Faucon slightly surpasses Kellovsky in dealing with breakpoints. However, when matches extend to decisive moments, Kellovsky demonstrates remarkable resilience.

Given Kellovsky's superior winning percentage in deciding sets and his slight edge in several key statistics, he appears to be the more likely candidate to clinch victory in this encounter. Combining these factors, Dominik Kellovsky is favored to win the upcoming match.